4.8 Review

Barriers to renewable/sustainable energy technologies adoption: Indian perspective

期刊

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
卷 41, 期 -, 页码 762-776

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.077

关键词

Renewable energy; Sustainable energy; Barrier to adopt renewable/sustainable; energy technologies; Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP); Sensitivity analysis; Indian perspective

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rapidly increasing energy demand and growing concern about economic and environmental consequences call for, renewable/sustainable energy technologies' adoption in India. Renewable/sustainable energy technologies have faced a number of constraints that have affected their rate of adoption. In this paper an attempt has been made to identify and rank the major barriers in the adoption of 'renewable and green' energy technologies in the Indian context. Twenty-eight barriers have been identified from an extensive literature review. These identified barriers have been categorized into seven dimensions of barriers, i.e. Economical 82 Financial; Market; Awareness & Information; Technical; Ecological and Geographical; Cultural 82 Behavioral; and Political 8 Government Issues. Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique has been utilized for ranking of barriers to adopt renewable/sustainable technologies in the Indian context. All pair comparisons in AHP have been made based on experts' opinions (selected from academia and industry). Sensitivity analysis has also been made to investigate the priority ranking stability of barriers to adopt renewable/sustainable technologies in the Indian context. This paper may help practitioners, regulators and academician focus their future efforts in adoption of 'renewable/sustainable energy technologies' in India. Further, this understanding may be helpful in framing the policies and strategies towards adoption of renewable/sustainable energy technologies. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据