4.7 Article

Deep gases discharged from mud volcanoes of Azerbaijan: New geochemical evidence

期刊

MARINE AND PETROLEUM GEOLOGY
卷 43, 期 -, 页码 450-463

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2012.12.003

关键词

Mud volcanoes; Azerbaijan; Fluid geochemistry; Gas source depth; Structural controls

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents new geochemical data of hydrocarbon-rich gases released from some mud volcanoes of Azerbaijan. Methane is considerably the most abundant component of all the sampled gases, which show delta D-CH4 and delta C-13-CH4 values likely related to a dominant thermogenic source. These gases are characterized by the presence of more than 20 different cyclic compounds with concentrations up to several mu mol/mol. A similar gas composition has recently been found to characterize many mud volcanoes of the Northern Apennines and Sicily (Italy). The data of the Azerbaijan mud volcanoes corroborate the notion that cyclic compounds can be considered reliable tracers for hydrocarbon gas production at considerable depths and temperatures up to 120-150 degrees C, which correspond to a 6.5-83 km depth range assuming an average geothermal gradient of 18 degrees C/km. This depth interval is consistent with both the depth of potential source rocks imaged seismically beneath some mud volcanoes, and the results of previous estimates that used the C-13/C-12 values of methane and ethane. Such deep-sourced gases and material (fluidized clayey mass and rock fragments) ascend into the core of anticlines and accumulate at shallower reservoirs, where fold-parallel outer-arc faults or fold-orthogonal fractures may penetrate and transfer the fluids to the surface. Finally, the basically equivalent composition of the different hydrocarbon groups (C-2-C-10 alkanes, aromatics and cyclic) determined in the gases sampled in both Azerbaijan and Italy manifests the lack of evident relationships between the chemistry of light hydrocarbons and the type of source rock. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据