4.4 Article

Flow-ecology relationships: closing the loop on effective environmental flows

期刊

MARINE AND FRESHWATER RESEARCH
卷 65, 期 2, 页码 133-141

出版社

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/MF13110

关键词

adaptive management; environmental watering; floodplain wetlands; flow-ecology relationships; freshwater; rivers

资金

  1. Department of Water (Western Australia)
  2. environmental flows program of the Tropical Rivers and Coastal Knowledge (TRaCK) research consortium
  3. Australian Rivers Institute (AA)
  4. University of Western Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Providing flows for biota and environmental processes is a challenging water management issue. For society the ability and willingness to allocate water to sustain the environment is increasingly competitive due to escalating demand and as a consequence of climate change. In response, an array of environmental flow (E-flow) methods have developed. Our view is that few E-flows have been implemented and even fewer evaluated in a research and management context. Much of our science effort in E-flows has been directed primarily at method development, with less attention being given to monitoring, evaluation and subsequent revision of E-flow strategies. Our objectives are to highlight the lack of connection between current trends in E-flow literature and theory with assessment of the efficacy and practical application of these methods. Specifically, effective E-flows need to be explicit about flow-ecology relationships to adequately determine the amount and timing of water required. We briefly outline the historical development of E-flows and discuss how serial development of methods and techniques has restricted implementation, evaluation and revision. We highlight areas where methods are lacking, such as incorporation of data on flow-ecology relationships into operational use of E-flow methods. We suggest four initial steps that will improve the applicability, implementation and ultimate success of E-flows.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据