4.8 Review

Nonrenewable energy, renewable energy, carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth in China from 1952 to 2012

期刊

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
卷 52, 期 -, 页码 680-688

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.176

关键词

Nonrenewable and renewable energy; CO2 emission; Economic growth

资金

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M551504]
  2. NSFC-NRF Scientific Cooperation Program [71411170250]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea - South Korean Government [NRF-2014K2A2A2000766, NRF-2014S1A2A2027622]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71471076, 71473107]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China [15KJD610002]
  6. National Research Foundation of Korea [2014S1A2A2027622] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper mainly investigates the relationship among energy consumption, carbon emissions and economic growth in China from 1952 to 2012. First, we implement unit root and cointegration analysis to test the stationary. Furthermore, we analyze the mutual influence among energy consumption, carbon emissions and economic growth through Granger causality analysis. Next, we also conduct static and dynamic regression analysis on the determinants of carbon emissions and economic growth. Last, we predict the future influence of different energy consumption on carbon emissions and economic growth. We find that coal has dominant impact on economic growth and carbon emissions. GDP (Gross Domestic Product) has bi-directional relationship with CO2 (carbon dioxide) emission, coal, gas, and electricity consumption. It is imperative to change energy consumption structure in China. We had better decrease coal consumption rate. It is significant to develop hydro and nuclear power in China. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据