3.9 Article

Cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire-Dutch Language Version

期刊

MANUAL THERAPY
卷 17, 期 4, 页码 330-335

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2012.03.001

关键词

Illness perceptions; Cross-cultural adaptation; Questionnaire; Activity limitations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Ever since Engel's Biopsychosocial Model (1977) emotions, thoughts, beliefs and behaviors are accepted as important factors of health. The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (Brief IPQ) assesses these beliefs. Aim of this study was to cross-culturally adapt the Brief IPQ into the Brief IPQ Dutch Language Version (Brief IPQ-DLV), and to assess its face validity, content validity, reproducibility, and concurrent validity. Methods: Beaton's guideline was used for cross-culturally adaptation. Face and content validity were assessed in 25 patients, 15 physiotherapists and 24 first-grade students. Reproducibility was established in 27 individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using Cohen's kappa coefficient (K-w) and the Smallest Detectable Change (SDC). Concurrent validity was assessed in 163 patients visiting 11 different physical therapists. Results: The Brief IPQ-DLV is well understood by patients, health care professionals and first-grade students. Reliability at 1 week for the dimensions Consequences, Concern and Emotional response K-w > 0.70, for the dimensions Personal control, Treatment control, Identity, K-w < 0.70. A time interval of 3 weeks, reliability coefficients were lower for almost all dimensions. SDC was between 2.45 and 3.37 points for individual measurement purposes and between 0.47 and 0.57 points for group evaluative measurement purposes. Concurrent validity showed significant correlations (P <. 05) for four out of eight illness perceptions (IPs) dimensions. Conclusion: The face and content properties were found to be acceptable. The reproducibility and concurrent validity needs further investigated. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据