4.2 Article

Landscape genetics of mountain lions (Puma concolor) in southern Brazil

期刊

MAMMALIAN BIOLOGY
卷 76, 期 4, 页码 476-483

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1016/j.mambio.2010.08.002

关键词

Landscape connectivity; Dispersal; Isolation-by-Resistance; Gene flow; Conservation

类别

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa (CNPq)
  2. Fundacao de Amparo Pesquisa do Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is suggested that mountain lions have suffered a bottleneck and lost their genetic diversity in an area in southern Brazil. In this study, we correlated landscape connectivity and patterns of gene flow to identify landscape permeability and possible sources of migrants for the population of mountain lions in southern Brazil, using circuit theory. Population structure was analyzed with Bayesian methods, and density and parentage relationships were also estimated, to evaluate the population genetic profile. We did not find genetic structure between samples, and landscape analysis indicated that all individuals were connected by areas that are permeable to mountain lion movements. The estimated population density was low, 0.09 and 0.32 mountain lions/100 km(2) (N-e/N = 0.11 and N-e/N = 0.4, respectively). Parentage results indicated that individuals killed in the same spot were not related, suggesting that mountain lions are still able to disperse through the landscape. Evidence indicates that severe habitat loss and consequent illegal hunting were responsible for a bottleneck and consequent loss of genetic variability, we demonstrated that the landscape still allows mountain lions to move, and that protected areas in southern Brazil may be acting as a source of migrants. This information indicates that conservation actions to reduce illegal hunting and to monitor protected areas are important to understand the impact of hunted areas on source areas. (C) 2010 Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Saugetierkunde. Published by Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据