4.4 Review

How absolute is zero? An evaluation of historical and current definitions of malaria elimination

期刊

MALARIA JOURNAL
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-9-213

关键词

-

资金

  1. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [49446, 1013832]
  2. Science & Technology Directorate, Department of Homeland Security
  3. Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health
  4. Exxon Mobil
  5. Wellcome Trust [079080]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Decisions to eliminate malaria from all or part of a country involve a complex set of factors, and this complexity is compounded by ambiguity surrounding some of the key terminology, most notably control and elimination. It is impossible to forecast resource and operational requirements accurately if endpoints have not been defined clearly, yet even during the Global Malaria Eradication Program, debate raged over the precise definition of eradication. Analogous deliberations regarding the meaning of elimination and control are basically nonexistent today despite these terms' core importance to programme planning. To advance the contemporary debate about these issues, this paper presents a historical review of commonly used terms, including control, elimination, and eradication, to help contextualize current understanding of these concepts. The review has been supported by analysis of the underlying mathematical concepts on which these definitions are based through simple branching process models that describe the proliferation of malaria cases following importation. Through this analysis, the importance of pragmatic definitions that are useful for providing malaria control and elimination programmes with a practical set of strategic milestones is emphasized, and it is argued that current conceptions of elimination in particular fail to achieve these requirements. To provide all countries with precise targets, new conceptual definitions are suggested to more precisely describe the old goals of control - here more exactly named controlled low-endemic malaria - and elimination. Additionally, it is argued that a third state, called controlled non-endemic malaria, is required to describe the epidemiological condition in which endemic transmission has been interrupted, but malaria resulting from onwards transmission from imported infections continues to occur at a sufficiently high level that elimination has not been achieved. Finally, guidelines are discussed for deriving the separate operational definitions and metrics that will be required to make these concepts relevant, measurable, and achievable for a particular environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据