4.4 Article

Effective and cheap removal of leukocytes and platelets from Plasmodium vivax infected blood

期刊

MALARIA JOURNAL
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-8-115

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust of Great Britain
  2. Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University (UL)
  3. Singapore Agency for Science Technology and Research (A*STAR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Investigations of Plasmodium vivax are restricted to samples collected from infected persons or primates, because this parasite cannot be maintained in in vitro cultures. Contamination of P. vivax isolates with host leukocytes and platelets is detrimental to a range of ex vivo and molecular investigations. Easy-to-produce CF11 cellulose filters have recently provided us with an inexpensive method for the removal of leukocytes and platelets. This contrasted with previous reports of unacceptably high levels of infected red blood cell (IRBC) retention by CF11. The aims of this study were to compare the ability of CF11 cellulose filters and the commercial filter Plasmodipur at removing leukocyte and platelet, and to investigate the retention of P. vivax IRBCs by CF11 cellulose filtration. Methods and Results: Side-by-side comparison of six leukocyte removal methods using blood samples from five healthy donor showed that CF11 filtration reduced the mean initial leukocyte counts from 9.4 x 10(3) per mu l [95%CI 5.2-13.5] to 0.01 x 10(3) [95% CI 0.01-0.03]. The CF11 was particularly effective at removing neutrophils. CF11 treatment also reduced initial platelet counts from 211.6 x 10(3) per mu l [95% CI 107.5-315.7] to 0.8 x 10(3) per mu l [95%CI -0.7-2.2]. Analysis of 30 P. vivax blood samples before and after CF11 filtration showed only a minor loss in parasitaemia (<= 7.1% of initial counts). Stage specific retention of P. vivax IRBCs was not observed. Conclusion: CF11 filtration is the most cost and time efficient method for the production of leukocyte- and platelet-free P. vivax-infected erythrocytes from field isolates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据