4.2 Article

In vivo MRS of locally advanced breast cancer: characteristics related to negative or positive choline detection and early monitoring of treatment response

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10334-011-0280-9

关键词

Magnetic resonance spectroscopy; Choline; Locally advanced breast cancer (LABC); Treatment response; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)

资金

  1. Research Council of Norway [175459]
  2. Norwegian Womens's Public Health Association
  3. Liaison Committee between the Central Norway Regional Health Authority (RHA)
  4. Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Object To explore factors determining the detection of total choline (tCho) by in vivo MR spectroscopy (MRS) in locally advanced breast cancer and to evaluate the ability of in vivo tCho to predict treatment response after one cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Materials and methods Breast cancer patients (N = 40) scheduled for NAC were examined with an MR protocol including in vivo single voxel proton MRS, dynamic contrast enhanced MRI and diffusion weighted MRI. tCho was quantified based on the signal-to-noise ratio. The detection was considered positive with tCho signal-to-noise ratio >= 2. Results tCho was detected in 60% of the patients. Excellent reliability in tCho (ICC = 0.97, P < 0.001) measurements was confirmed. The water/fat-ratio, tumor volume and distribution of Type II voxels (based on contrast uptake curve) were significantly higher in patients with positive choline detection. The probability of detecting tCho was higher in ER-negative patients. A significant decrease in tChoSNR was detected after treatment, but responders could not be distinguished from non-responders. Conclusion The use of in vivo MRS in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment monitoring should bring supplementary information to the standard MR imaging protocol. With the currently observed low choline detection rate, this is not the case, and technological challenges related to choline detection have to be resolved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据