4.7 Article

Global vegetation gross primary production estimation using satellite-derived light-use efficiency and canopy conductance

期刊

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
卷 163, 期 -, 页码 206-216

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2015.03.016

关键词

Photosynthesis; Canopy conductance; Light use efficiency; FLUXNET; MODIS; Gross primary production; GPP; Vegetation

资金

  1. AmeriFlux (U.S. Department of Energy, Biological and Environmental Research, Terrestrial Carbon Program) [DE-FG02-04ER63917, DE-FG02-04ER63911]
  2. CarboEuropeIP
  3. FAO-GTOS-TCO
  4. iLEAPS
  5. Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
  6. National Science Foundation
  7. University of Tuscia
  8. Universite Laval and Environment Canada
  9. US Department of Energy
  10. Commonwealth of Australia through the Cooperative Research Centre programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Climate and physiological controls of vegetation gross primary production (GPP) vary in space and time. In many ecosystems, GPP is primary limited by absorbed photosynthetically-active radiation; in others by canopy conductance. These controls further vary in importance over daily to seasonal time scales. We propose a simple but effective conceptual model that estimates GPP as the lesser of a conductance-limited (F-c) and radiation-limited (Fr) assimilation rate. F-c is estimated from canopy conductance while Fr is estimated using a light use efficiency model. Both can be related to vegetation properties observed by optical remote sensing. The model has only two fitting parameters: maximum light use efficiency, and the minimum achieved ratio of internal to external CO2 concentration. The two parameters were estimated using data from 16 eddy covariance flux towers for six major biomes including both energy- and water-limited ecosystems. Evaluation of model estimates with flux tower-derived GPP compared favourably to that of more complex models, for fluxes averaged; per day (r(2) = 0.72, root mean square error, RMSE = 2.48 mu mol C m(2) s(-1), relative percentage error, RPE = -11%), over 8-day periods (r(2) = 0.78 RMSE = 2.09 mu mol C m(2) s(-1),RPE = -10%), over months (r(2) = 0.79, RMSE = 1.93 mu mol C m(2) s(-1), RPE = -9%) and over years (r(2) = 0.54, RMSE = 1.62 umol C m(2) s(-1), RPE = -9%). Using the model we estimated global GPP of 107 Pg C y(-1) for 2000-2011. This value is within the range reported by other GPP models and the spatial and inter-annual patterns compared favourably. The main advantages of the proposed model are its simplicity, avoiding the use of uncertain biome- or land-cover class mapping, and inclusion of explicit coupling between GPP and plant transpiration. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据