4.5 Article

A General Linear Relaxometry Model of R1 Using Imaging Data

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
卷 73, 期 3, 页码 1309-1314

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25210

关键词

R-1; T-1; PD; PD*; MT; R-2*; T-2*; longitudinal relaxation; transverse relaxation; magnetization transfer; quantitative; 3T; water content; relaxometry

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [MO 2397/1-1]
  2. Wellcome Trust [091593/Z/10/Z]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PurposeThe longitudinal relaxation rate (R-1) measured in vivo depends on the local microstructural properties of the tissue, such as macromolecular, iron, and water content. Here, we use whole brain multiparametric in vivo data and a general linear relaxometry model to describe the dependence of R-1 on these components. We explore a) the validity of having a single fixed set of model coefficients for the whole brain and b) the stability of the model coefficients in a large cohort. MethodsMaps of magnetization transfer (MT) and effective transverse relaxation rate (R-2*) were used as surrogates for macromolecular and iron content, respectively. Spatial variations in these parameters reflected variations in underlying tissue microstructure. A linear model was applied to the whole brain, including gray/white matter and deep brain structures, to determine the global model coefficients. Synthetic R-1 values were then calculated using these coefficients and compared with the measured R-1 maps. ResultsThe model's validity was demonstrated by correspondence between the synthetic and measured R-1 values and by high stability of the model coefficients across a large cohort. ConclusionA single set of global coefficients can be used to relate R-1, MT, and R-2* across the whole brain. Our population study demonstrates the robustness and stability of the model. Magn Reson Med, 2014. (c) 2014 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Magn Reson Med 73:1309-1314, 2015. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据