4.5 Article

Denoising Diffusion-Weighted Magnitude MR Images Using Rank and Edge Constraints

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
卷 71, 期 3, 页码 1272-1284

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24728

关键词

diffusion-weighted imaging; diffusion tensor imaging; Rician distribution; noncentral distribution; low-rank approximation; edge constraints

资金

  1. NIH [NIH-P41-EB015904, NIH-P41-EB001977, NIH-1RO1-EB013695]
  2. Beckman Graduate Fellowship, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PurposeTo improve signal-to-noise ratio for diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images. MethodsA new method is proposed for denoising diffusion-weighted magnitude images. The proposed method formulates the denoising problem as an maximum a posteriori} estimation problem based on Rician/noncentral likelihood models, incorporating an edge prior and a low-rank model. The resulting optimization problem is solved efficiently using a half-quadratic method with an alternating minimization scheme. ResultsThe performance of the proposed method has been validated using simulated and experimental data. Diffusion-weighted images and noisy data were simulated based on the diffusion tensor imaging model and Rician/noncentral distributions. The simulation study (with known gold standard) shows substantial improvements in single-to-noise ratio and diffusion tensor estimation after denoising. In vivo diffusion imaging data at different b-values were acquired. Based on the experimental data, qualitative improvement in image quality and quantitative improvement in diffusion tensor estimation were demonstrated. Additionally, the proposed method is shown to outperform one of the state-of-the-art nonlocal means-based denoising algorithms, both qualitatively and quantitatively. ConclusionThe single-to-noise ratio of diffusion-weighted images can be effectively improved with rank and edge constraints, resulting in an improvement in diffusion parameter estimation accuracy. Magn Reson Med 71:1272-1284, 2014. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据