4.5 Article

Analysis and Correction of Gradient Nonlinearity Bias in Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurements

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
卷 71, 期 3, 页码 1312-1323

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24773

关键词

diffusion MRI; gradient nonlinearity; ADC systematic bias

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH/NCI) [P01-CA85878, SAIC 29XS161, U01-CA166104]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PurposeGradient nonlinearity of MRI systems leads to spatially dependent b-values and consequently high non-uniformity errors (10-20%) in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements over clinically relevant field-of-views. This work seeks practical correction procedure that effectively reduces observed ADC bias for media of arbitrary anisotropy in the fewest measurements. MethodsAll-inclusive bias analysis considers spatial and time-domain cross-terms for diffusion and imaging gradients. The proposed correction is based on rotation of the gradient nonlinearity tensor into the diffusion gradient frame where spatial bias of b-matrix can be approximated by its Euclidean norm. Correction efficiency of the proposed procedure is numerically evaluated for a range of model diffusion tensor anisotropies and orientations. ResultsSpatial dependence of nonlinearity correction terms accounts for the bulk (75-95%) of ADC bias for FA=0.3-0.9. Residual ADC non-uniformity errors are amplified for anisotropic diffusion. This approximation obviates need for full diffusion tensor measurement and diagonalization to derive a corrected ADC. Practical scenarios are outlined for implementation of the correction on clinical MRI systems. ConclusionsThe proposed simplified correction algorithm appears sufficient to control ADC non-uniformity errors in clinical studies using three orthogonal diffusion measurements. The most efficient reduction of ADC bias for anisotropic medium is achieved with non-lab-based diffusion gradients. Magn Reson Med 71:1312-1323, 2014. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据