4.5 Article

Magnetic Susceptibility Induced White Matter MR Signal Frequency Shifts-Experimental Comparison Between Lorentzian Sphere and Generalized Lorentzian Approaches

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
卷 71, 期 3, 页码 1251-1263

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24762

关键词

phase contrast; generalized Lorentzian approach; optic nerve; magnetic susceptibility; quantitative susceptibility mapping

资金

  1. NIH [5R01NS055963]
  2. NMSS [RG 4463A18]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PurposeThe nature of the remarkable phase contrast in high-field gradient echo MRI studies of human brain is a subject of intense debates. The generalized Lorentzian approach (He and Yablonskiy, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:13558-13563) provides an explanation for the anisotropy of phase contrast, the near absence of phase contrast between white matter and cerebrospinal fluid, and changes of phase contrast in multiple sclerosis. In this study, we experimentally validate the generalized Lorentzian approach. Theory and MethodsThe Generalized Lorentzian Approach suggests that the local contribution to frequency shifts in white matter does not depend on the average tissue magnetic susceptibility (as suggested by Lorentzian sphere approximation), but on the distribution and symmetry of magnetic susceptibility inclusions at the cellular level. We use ex vivo rat optic nerve as a model system of highly organized cellular structure containing longitudinally arranged myelin and neurofilaments. The nerve's cylindrical shape allowed accurate measurement of its magnetic susceptibility and local frequency shifts. ResultsWe found that the volume magnetic susceptibility difference between nerve and water is -0.116 ppm, and the magnetic susceptibilities of longitudinal components are -0.043 ppm in fresh nerve, and -0.020 ppm in fixed nerve. ConclusionThe frequency shift observed in the optic nerve as a representative of white matter is consistent with generalized Lorentzian approach but inconsistent with Lorentzian sphere approximation. Magn Reson Med 71:1251-1263, 2014. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据