4.5 Article

Renal Perfusion Imaging with Two-Dimensional Navigator Gated Arterial Spin Labeling

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
卷 71, 期 2, 页码 570-579

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24692

关键词

2D navigator; renal perfusion; FAIR True-FISP; respiratory motion

资金

  1. NIH [R21DK079080, R01DK093793]
  2. AHA [SDG0835367N]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PurposeTo develop a navigator technique enabling free-breathing acquisition to afford sufficient signal averaging for quantitative renal perfusion measurement using arterial spin labeling MRI. MethodsA novel two-dimensional (2D) navigator technique was implemented in concert with flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) preparation and true fast imaging with steady precession (True-FISP) readout. The navigator images were obtained with a low-resolution fast low angle shot readout at end of each arterial spin labeling acquisition. A retrospective algorithm was developed to automatically detect respiratory motion for selective signal averaging. The 2D navigator-gated FAIR True-FISP sequence was performed in ten healthy volunteers and five patients with chronic kidney disease. ResultsExcellent image quality and comparable cortical perfusion rates (healthy: 27628 mL/100 g/min, patients: 155 +/- 25 mL/100 g/min) to literature values were obtained. An average of 3-fold signal-to-noise ratio improvement was obtained in the 2D navigator-gated approach compared with the breath-hold acquisition in healthy volunteers. Good image quality was achieved in patients while the results from breath-hold acquisition were unusable. The quantitative perfusion rates were significantly lower in chronic kidney disease patients compared with the healthy volunteers. Conclusion2D navigator-gated free breathing arterial spin labeling is feasible and is a noninvasive method to evaluate renal perfusion both in healthy subjects and those with chronic kidney disease. Magn Reson Med 71:570-579, 2014. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据