4.5 Article

The Hanes-Woolf Linear QUESP Method Improves the Measurements of Fast Chemical Exchange Rates with CEST MRI

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
卷 71, 期 4, 页码 1603-1612

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24792

关键词

chemical exchange saturation transfer; MRI; chemical exchange rates; Bloch; QUEST; QUESP; omega plot

资金

  1. NIH [9R01 CA169774-01, P50 CA5060]
  2. Phoenix Friends of the Arizona Cancer Center
  3. Community Foundation of Southern Arizona

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PurposeContrast agents for chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI often require an accurate measurement of the chemical exchange rate. Many analysis methods have been reported that measure chemical exchange rates. Additional analysis methods were derived as part of this study. This report investigated the accuracy and precision of each analysis method. MethodsChemical exchange saturation transfer spectra were simulated using the Bloch-McConnell equations modified for chemical exchange. Chemical exchange saturation transfer spectra of iopromide were obtained with a range of saturation times, saturation powers, and concentrations. These simulated and experimental results were used to estimate the chemical exchange rate using the QUESP, QUEST, Omega Plot (LB-QUESP), EH-QUESP, HW-QUESP, LB-Conc, EH-Conc, and HW-Conc methods. ResultsBloch fitting produced the most precise estimates of chemical exchange rates, although substantial expertise and computation time were required to achieve these results. Of the more simplistic analysis methods, the HW-QUESP method produced the most accurate and precise estimates of fast exchange rates. The QUEST and LB-QUESP methods produced the most accurate estimates of slow exchange rates, especially with samples that have short T-1w relaxation times. ConclusionsHW-QUESP is a simplistic analysis method that should be used when fast chemical exchange rates need to be estimated from chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI results. Magn Reson Med 71:1603-1612, 2014. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据