4.5 Article

Octopus Visual System: A Functional MRI Model for Detecting Neuronal Electric Currents without a Blood-Oxygen-Level-Dependent Confound

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
卷 72, 期 5, 页码 1311-1319

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25051

关键词

functional MRI; retina; optic lobe; electroretinogram; local field potential; cephalopod

资金

  1. NIH [RO1EB015023, R21EB004753]
  2. NSF [IOS-1021909]
  3. China national strategic basic research 973 program [2012CB720701]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PurposeDespite the efforts that have been devoted to detecting the transient magnetic fields generated by neuronal firing, the conclusion that a functionally relevant signal can be measured with MRI is still controversial. For human studies of neuronal current MRI (nc-MRI), the blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) effect remains an irresolvable confound. For tissue studies where hemoglobin is removed, natural sensory stimulation is not possible. This study investigates the feasibility of detecting a physiologically induced nc-MRI signal in vivo in a BOLD-free environment. MethodsThe cephalopod mollusc Octopus bimaculoides has vertebrate-like eyes, large optic lobes (OLs), and blood that does not contain hemoglobin. Visually evoked potentials were measured in the octopus retina and OL by electroretinogram and local field potential. nc-MRI scans were conducted at 9.4 Tesla to capture these activities. ResultsElectrophysiological recording detected strong responses in the retina and OL in vivo; however, nc-MRI failed to demonstrate any statistically significant signal change with a detection threshold of 0.2 degrees for phase and 0.2% for magnitude. Experiments in a dissected eye-OL preparation yielded similar results. ConclusionThese findings in a large hemoglobin-free nervous system suggest that sensory evoked neuronal magnetic fields are too weak for direct detection with current MRI technology. Magn Reson Med 72:1311-1319, 2014. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据