4.5 Article

Monte Carlo SURE-Based Parameter Selection for Parallel Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reconstruction

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
卷 71, 期 5, 页码 1760-1770

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24840

关键词

parallel imaging reconstruction; regularization parameter selection; Stein's unbiased risk estimate; Monte Carlo methods

资金

  1. NIH [F32 EB015914]
  2. NIH/NCI [P01 CA87634]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PurposeRegularizing parallel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reconstruction significantly improves image quality but requires tuning parameter selection. We propose a Monte Carlo method for automatic parameter selection based on Stein's unbiased risk estimate that minimizes the multichannel k-space mean squared error (MSE). We automatically tune parameters for image reconstruction methods that preserve the undersampled acquired data, which cannot be accomplished using existing techniques. TheoryWe derive a weighted MSE criterion appropriate for data-preserving regularized parallel imaging reconstruction and the corresponding weighted Stein's unbiased risk estimate. We describe a Monte Carlo approximation of the weighted Stein's unbiased risk estimate that uses two evaluations of the reconstruction method per candidate parameter value. MethodsWe reconstruct images using the denoising sparse images from GRAPPA using the nullspace method (DESIGN) and L-1 iterative self-consistent parallel imaging (L-1-SPIRiT). We validate Monte Carlo Stein's unbiased risk estimate against the weighted MSE. We select the regularization parameter using these methods for various noise levels and undersampling factors and compare the results to those using MSE-optimal parameters. ResultsOur method selects nearly MSE-optimal regularization parameters for both DESIGN and L-1-SPIRiT over a range of noise levels and undersampling factors. ConclusionThe proposed method automatically provides nearly MSE-optimal choices of regularization parameters for data-preserving nonlinear parallel MRI reconstruction methods. Magn Reson Med 71:1760-1770, 2014. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据