4.5 Article

PCLR: Phase-Constrained Low-Rank Model for Compressive Diffusion-Weighted MRI

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
卷 72, 期 5, 页码 1330-1341

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25052

关键词

diffusion-weighted MRI; compressive sensing; low rank; phase correction; GRAPPA; diffusion tensor; tractography

资金

  1. NIH/NIBIB [R21EB013387, P50MH100029]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PurposeThis work develops a compressive sensing approach for diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI. Theory and MethodsA phase-constrained low-rank (PCLR) approach was developed using the image coherence across the DW directions for efficient compressive DW MRI, while accounting for drastic phase changes across the DW directions, possibly as a result of eddy current, and rigid and nonrigid motions. In PCLR, a low-resolution phase estimation was used for removing phase inconsistency between DW directions. In our implementation, GRAPPA (generalized autocalibrating partial parallel acquisition) was incorporated for better phase estimation while allowing higher undersampling factor. An efficient and easy-to-implement image reconstruction algorithm, consisting mainly of partial Fourier update and singular value decomposition, was developed for solving PCLR. ResultsThe error measures based on diffusion-tensor-derived metrics and tractography indicated that PCLR, with its joint reconstruction of all DW images using the image coherence, outperformed the frame-independent reconstruction through zero-padding FFT. Furthermore, using GRAPPA for phase estimation, PCLR readily achieved a four-fold undersampling. ConclusionThe PCLR is developed and demonstrated for compressive DW MRI. A four-fold reduction in k-space sampling could be readily achieved without substantial degradation of reconstructed images and diffusion tensor measures, making it possible to significantly reduce the data acquisition in DW MRI and/or improve spatial and angular resolutions. Magn Reson Med 72:1330-1341, 2014. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据