4.5 Article

Highly accelerated real-time cardiac cine MRI using k-t SPARSE-SENSE

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
卷 70, 期 1, 页码 64-74

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24440

关键词

MRI; heart; real-time; cardiac cine; compressed sensing; k-t SPARSE-SENSE

资金

  1. American Heart Association [0730143N]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01-EB000447-07A1]
  3. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [K12HS019473]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For patients with impaired breath-hold capacity and/or arrhythmias, real-time cine MRI may be more clinically useful than breath-hold cine MRI. However, commercially available real-time cine MRI methods using parallel imaging typically yield relatively poor spatio-temporal resolution due to their low image acquisition speed. We sought to achieve relatively high spatial resolution (approximate to 2.5 x 2.5 mm2) and temporal resolution (approximate to 40 ms), to produce high-quality real-time cine MR images that could be applied clinically for wall motion assessment and measurement of left ventricular function. In this work, we present an eightfold accelerated real-time cardiac cine MRI pulse sequence using a combination of compressed sensing and parallel imaging (k-t SPARSE-SENSE). Compared with reference, breath-hold cine MRI, our eightfold accelerated real-time cine MRI produced significantly worse qualitative grades (1-5 scale), but its image quality and temporal fidelity scores were above 3.0 (adequate) and artifacts and noise scores were below 3.0 (moderate), suggesting that acceptable diagnostic image quality can be achieved. Additionally, both eightfold accelerated real-time cine and breath-hold cine MRI yielded comparable left ventricular function measurements, with coefficient of variation <10% for left ventricular volumes. Our proposed eightfold accelerated real-time cine MRI with k-t SPARSE-SENSE is a promising modality for rapid imaging of myocardial function. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2013. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据