4.5 Article

19F MRI Detection of Acute Allograft Rejection with In Vivo Perfluorocarbon Labeling of Immune Cells

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
卷 65, 期 4, 页码 1145-1154

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22702

关键词

heart rejection; kidney rejection; magnetic resonance imaging; noninvasive detection of graft rejection

资金

  1. NIH [RO1-HL081349, R01-CA134633, R01-EB003453, P01-HD047675, P41EB-001977]
  2. Pittsburgh NMR Center for Biomedical Research, an NIH

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Current diagnosis of organ rejection following transplantation relies on tissue biopsy, which is not ideal due to sampling limitations and risks associated with the invasive procedure. We have previously shown that cellular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of iron-oxide labeled immune-cell infiltration can provide a noninvasive measure of rejection status by detecting areas of hypointensity on T-2*-weighted images. In this study, we tested the feasibility of using a fluorine-based cellular tracer agent to detect macrophage accumulation in rodent models of acute allograft rejection by fluorine-19 (F-19) MRI and magnetic resonance spectroscopy. This study used two rat models of acute rejection, including abdominal heterotopic cardiac transplant and orthotopic kidney transplant models. Following in vivo labeling of monocytes and macrophages with a commercially available agent containing perfluoro-15-crown-5-ether, we observed F-19-signal intensity in the organs experiencing rejection by F-19 MRI, and conventional H-1 MRI was used for anatomical context. Immunofluorescense and histology confirmed macrophage labeling. These results are consistent with our previous studies and show the complementary nature of the two cellular imaging techniques. With no background signal, F-19 MRI/magnetic resonance spectroscopy can provide unambiguous detection of fluorine labeled cells, and may be a useful technique for detecting and quantifying rejection grade in patients. Magn Reson Med 65:1145-1154, 2011. (C) 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据