4.5 Article

Model-Based Reconstruction for Cardiac Cine MRI Without ECG or Breath Holding

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
卷 63, 期 5, 页码 1247-1257

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22312

关键词

Artifacts; cardiac imaging; gating; motion correction; navigators; reconstruction

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [UK EPSRC EP/E001564]
  2. EPSRC [EP/E001076/1, EP/E001564/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/E001076/1, EP/E001564/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper describes an acquisition and reconstruction strategy for cardiac cine MRI that does not require the use of electrocardiogram or breath holding. The method has similarities with self-gated techniques as information about cardiac and respiratory motion is derived from the imaging sequence itself; here, by acquiring the center k-space line at the beginning of each segment of a balanced steady-state free precession sequence. However, the reconstruction step is fundamentally different: a generalized reconstruction by inversion of coupled systems is used instead of conventional gating. By correcting for nonrigid cardiac and respiratory motion, generalized reconstruction by inversion of coupled systems (GRICS) uses all acquired data, whereas gating rejects data acquired in certain motion states. The method relies on the processing and analysis of the k-space central line data: local information from a 32-channel cardiac coil is used in order to automatically extract eigenmodes of both cardiac and respiratory motion. In the GRICS framework, these eigenmodes are used as driving signals of a motion model. The motion model is defined piecewise, so that each cardiac phase is reconstructed independently. Results from six healthy volunteers, with various slice orientations, show improved image quality compared to combined respiratory and cardiac gating. Magn Reson Med 63:1247-1257, 2010. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据