4.7 Review

Generalizing predictive models of forest inventory attributes using an area-based approach with airborne LiDAR data

期刊

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
卷 156, 期 -, 页码 322-334

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2014.10.004

关键词

Canopy structure; Forest inventory; Airborne LiDAR; Model generalization; Area-based approach; Foliage density profile

资金

  1. French National Research Agency (ANR) Grant within the Framework of the FORESEE project [ANR-2010-BIOE-008]
  2. Ministere des Relations internationales, de la Francophonie et du Commerce exterieur in Quebec
  3. Ministere des Affaires Etrangeres et Europeennes in France

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposed modifying the conceptual approach that is commonly used to model development of stand attribute estimates using airborne LiDAR data. New models were developed using an area-based approach to predict wood volume, stem volume, aboveground biomass, and basal-area across a wide range of canopy structures, sites and LiDAR characteristics. This new modeling approach does not adopt standard approaches of stepwise regression using a series of height metrics derived from airborne LiDAR. Rather, it used four metrics describing complementary 3D structural aspects of the stand canopy. The first three metrics were related to mean canopy height, height heterogeneity, and horizontal canopy distribution. A fourth metric was calculated as the coefficient of variation of the leaf area density profile. This fourth metric provided information on understory vegetation. The models that were developed with the four structural metrics provided higher estimation accuracy on stand attributes than models using height metrics alone, while also avoiding data over-fitting. Overall, the models provided prediction error levels ranging from 12.4% to 24.2%, depending upon forest type and stand attribute. The more homogeneous coniferous stand provided the highest estimation accuracy. Estimation errors were significantly reduced in mixed forest when separate models were developed for individual stand types (coniferous, mixed and deciduous stands) instead of a general model for all stand types. Model robustness was also evaluated in leaf-off and leaf-on conditions where both conditions provided similar estimation errors. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据