4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

SEMAC: Slice Encoding for Metal Artifact Correction in MRI

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
卷 62, 期 1, 页码 66-76

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21967

关键词

distortion correction; metallic implants; metal artifacts; metal-induced distortions; susceptibility artifact; field inhomogeneities; distorted excitation profiles; view-angle-tilting

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R29 CA077677, R01 CA077677-09, R01 CA077677] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [2P41RR009784-11, P41 RR009784, P41 RR009784-11] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL075803-01, R01 HL075803] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIBIB NIH HHS [R01 EB002524, EB002524-01, R01 EB002524-01] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) near metallic implants remains an unmet need because of severe artifacts, which mainly stem from large metal-induced field inhomogeneities. This work addresses MRI near metallic implants with an innovative imaging technique called Slice Encoding for Metal Artifact Correction (SEMAC). The SEMAC technique corrects metal artifacts via robust encoding of each excited slice against metal-induced field inhomogeneities. The robust slice encoding is achieved by extending a view-angle-tilting (VAT) spin-echo sequence with additional z-phase encoding. Although the VAT compensation gradient suppresses most in-plane distortions, the z-phase encoding fully resolves distorted excitation profiles that cause through-plane distortions. By positioning all spins in a region-of-interest to their actual spatial locations, the through-plane distortions can be corrected by summing up the resolved spins in each voxel. The SEMAC technique does not require additional hardware and can be deployed to the large installed base of whole-body MRI systems. The efficacy of the SEMAC technique in eliminating metal-induced distortions with feasible scan times is validated in phantom and in vivo spine and knee studies. Magn Reson Med 62:66-76,2009. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据