4.5 Article

Strategies for Reducing Respiratory Motion Artifacts in Renal Perfusion Imaging With Arterial Spin Labeling

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
卷 61, 期 6, 页码 1374-1387

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21960

关键词

renal perfusion; pulsed-continuous arterial spin labeling; pCASL; background suppression; motion artifacts; respiratory motion; physiological motion

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health
  2. National Cancer Institute [CA121570]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Arterial spin labeling (ASL) perfusion measurements may have many applications outside the brain. In the abdomen, severe image artifacts can arise from motions between acquisitions of multiple signal averages in ASL, even with single-shot image acquisition. Background suppression and respiratory motion synchronization techniques can be used to ameliorate these artifacts. Two separate in vivo studies of renal perfusion imaging using pulsed continuous ASL (pCASL) were performed. The first study assessed various combinations of background suppression and breathing strategies. The second investigated the retrospective sorting of images acquired during free breathing based on respiratory position. Quantitative assessments of the test-retest repeatability of perfusion measurements and the image quality scored by two radiologists were made. Image quality was most significantly improved by using background suppression schemes and controlled breathing when compared to other combinations without background suppression or with free breathing, assessed by test-retests (5% level, F-test), and by radiologists' scores (5% level, Mann-Whitney U-test). Under free breathing, retrospectively sorting images based on respiratory position showed significant improvement. Both radiologists found 100% of the images had preferable image sharpness after sorting. High-quality renal perfusion measurements with reduced respiratory motion artifacts have been demonstrated using ASL when appropriate background suppression and breathing strategies are applied. Magn Reson Med 61:1374-1387, 2009. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据