4.5 Article

Gleaning Multicomponent T1 and T2 Information From Steady-State Imaging Data

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
卷 60, 期 6, 页码 1372-1387

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21704

关键词

multicomponent relaxation; T(1); T(2); quantitative magnetic resonance imaging; human brain imaging; steady-state imaging

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  2. MRC [G0800298] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [G0800298] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The driven-equilibrium single-pulse observation of T(1) (DESPOT1) and T(2) (DESPOT2) are rapid, accurate, and precise methods for voxelwise determination of the longitudinal and transverse relaxation times. A limitation of the methods, however, is the inherent assumption of single-component relaxation. In a variety of biological tissues, in particular human white matter (WM) and gray matter (GM), the relaxation has been shown to be more completely characterized by a summation of two or more relaxation components, or species, each believed to be associated with unique microanatomical domains or water pools. Unfortunately, characterization of these components on a voxelwise, whole-brain basis has traditionally been hindered by impractical acquisition times. In this work we extend the conventional DESPOT(1) and DESPOT(2) approaches to include multicomponent relaxation analysis. Following numerical analysis of the new technique, renamed multicomponent driven equilibrium single pulse observation of T(1)/T(2) (mcDESPOT), wholebrain multicomponent T(1) and T(2) quantification is demonstrated in vivo with clinically realistic times of between 16 and 30 min. Results obtained from four healthy individuals and two primary progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) patients demonstrate the future potential of the approach for identifying and assessing tissue changes associated with several neurodegenerative conditions, in particular those associated with WM. Magn Reson Med 60:1372-1387, 2008. (C) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据