4.5 Article

Fiber Tracking of Human Brain Using Fourth-Order Tensor and High Angular Resolution Diffusion Imaging

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
卷 60, 期 5, 页码 1207-1217

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21775

关键词

diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging; high angular resolution; high-rank tensors; fiber tracking using fourth-order tensors; tensor decomposition

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The accuracy of fiber tracking on the basis of diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging (DTI) is affected by many parameters. To increase accuracy of the tracking algorithm, we introduce DTI with a fourth-order tensor. Tensor elements comprise information obtained by high angular resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI). We further developed the flattened high rank tensor (FLAHRT) method and applied it to the measured fourth-order tensor. We then compared FLAHRT with: 1) the standard tracking algorithm using a second-order tensor; and 2) existing techniques involving the representation of conventional second-order tensor components as a weighted average of fourth-order tensor elements. Such techniques have been formulated in recent DT studies to link high-rank to low-rank Cartesian diffusion tensors (DTs). Diagonalization of the second-order tensor decomposes the tensor into three eigenvalues and three eigenvectors, which in turn are used to describe the diffusivity profile of a particular voxel. Diagonalization after application of the FLAHRT method reveals six eigenvalues and six eigentensors, resulting in a more accurate description of the anisotropy. We performed fiber tracking based on the eigenvalues and eigentensors calculated with the FLAHRT and standard methods. We could show that the FLAHRT technique gives more consistent and more accurate results even with a data set acquired in 15 directions only. The decomposition of the fourth-order tensor into six eigentensors has the potential to describe six different fiber orientations within a voxel. Magn Reson Med 60:1207-1217, 2008. (C) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据