4.5 Article

Magnitude least squares optimization for parallel radio frequency excitation design demonstrated at 7 Tesla with eight channels

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
卷 59, 期 4, 页码 908-915

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21513

关键词

parallel excitation; acceleration; magnitude least squares; RF shimming

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [P41 RR014075, P41 RR014075-106002, P41RR14075] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIBIB NIH HHS [R01 EB006847-02S1, R01 EB007942-01A2, R01 EB006847, R01EB006847, R01 EB007942] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spatially tailored radio frequency (RF) excitations accelerated with parallel transmit systems provide the opportunity to create shaped volume excitations or mitigate inhomogeneous B-1 excitation profiles with clinically relevant pulse lengths. While such excitations are often designed as a least-squares optimized approximation to a target magnitude and phase profile, adherence to the target phase profile is usually not important as long as the excitation phase is slowly varying compared with the voxel dimension. In this work, we demonstrate a method for a magnitude least squares optimization of the target magnetization profile for multichannel parallel excitation to improve the magnitude profile and reduce the RF power at the cost of a less uniform phase profile. The method enables the designer to trade off the allowed spatial phase variation for the improvement in magnitude profile and reduction in RF power. We validate the method with simulation studies and demonstrate its performance in fourfold accelerated two-dimensional spiral excitations, as well as for uniform in-plane slice selective parallel excitations using an eight-channel transmit array on a 7T human MRI scanner. The experimental results are in good agreement with the simulations, which show significant improvement in the magnitude profile and reductions in the required RF power while still maintaining negligible intravoxel phase variation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据