4.4 Article

Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging at different magnetic field strengths: What is feasible?

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
卷 32, 期 10, 页码 1247-1258

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2014.07.013

关键词

Intravoxel incoherent motion; IVIM; Cerebral blood volume; 7 Tesla

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council [13514, 2005-6910, 2007-3974, 2007-6079]
  2. Crafoord Foundation
  3. Lund University Hospital Donation Funds
  4. Swedish Cancer Society [2009/1076]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Due to limited SNR the cerebral applications of the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) concept have been sparse. MRI hardware developments have resulted in improved SNR and this may justify a reassessment of IVIM imaging for non-invasive quantification of the cerebral blood volume (CBV) as a first step toward determining the optimal field strength. Purpose: To investigate intravoxel incoherent motion imaging for its potential to assess cerebral blood volume (CBV) at three different MRI field strengths. Materials and methods: Four volunteers were scanned twice at 1.5 T, 3 T as well as 7 T. By correcting for field-strength-dependent effects of relaxation, estimates of corrected CBV (cCBV) were obtained in deep gray matter (DGM), frontal gray matter (FGM) and frontal white matter (FWM), using Bayesian analysis. In addition, simulations were performed to facilitate the interpretation of experimental data. Results: In DGM, FGM and FWM we obtained cCBV estimates of 2.2 ml/100 ml, 2.7 ml/100 ml, 1.4 ml/100 ml at 1.5 T; 3.7 ml/100 ml, 5.0 ml/100 ml, 3.2 ml/100 ml at 3 T and 15.5 ml/100 ml, 20.3 ml/100 ml, 7.0 ml/100 ml at 7 T. Conclusion: Quantitative cCBV values obtained at 1.5 T and 3 T corresponded better to physiological reference values, while 7 T showed the largest deviation from expected values. Simulations of synthetic tissue voxels indicated that the discrepancy at 7 T can partly be explained by SNR issues. Results were generally more repeatable at 7 T (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC = 0.84) than at 1.5 T (ICC = 0.68) and 3 T (ICC = 0.46). (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据