4.4 Article

Diffusion tensor parameters and principal eigenvector coherence: Relation to b-value intervals and field strength

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
卷 31, 期 5, 页码 742-747

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.11.014

关键词

Diffusion tensor imaging; High-field; High b-value; Principal eigenvector coherence

资金

  1. Research into Ageing [256]
  2. Wellcome Trust
  3. Medical Research Council [G0300117, G1002276] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. MRC [G0300117, G1002276] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diffusion-weighted MRI images acquired at b-value greater than 1000 s mm(-2) measure the diffusion of a restricted pool of water molecules. High b-value images are accompanied by a reduction in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) due to the application of large diffusion gradients. By fitting the diffusion tensor model to data acquired at incremental b-value intervals, we determined the effect of SNR on tensor parameters in normal human brains, in vivo. In addition, we also investigated the impact of field strength on the diffusion tensor model. Data were acquired at 1.5 and 3 T, at b-values 0, 1000, 2000 and 3000 s mm(-2) in twenty diffusion-sensitised directions. Fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD) and principal eigenvector coherence (K) were calculated from diffusion tensors fitted between datasets with b-values 0-1000, 0-2000, 0-3000, 1000-2000 and 2000-3000 s mm(-2). Field strength and b-value effects on diffusion parameters were analysed in white and grey matter regions of interest. Decreases in FA, K and MD were found with increasing b-value in white matter. Univariate analysis showed a significant increase in FA with increasing field strength in highly organised white matter. These results suggest there are significant differences in diffusion parameters at 1.5 and 3 T and that the optimal results, in terms of the highest values of FA in white matter, are obtained at 3 T with a maximum b = 1000 s mm(-2). (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据