4.4 Article

3D sensitivity encoded ellipsoidal MR spectroscopic imaging of gliomas at 3T

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
卷 27, 期 9, 页码 1249-1257

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2009.05.028

关键词

Glioma; 3D MR spectroscopic imaging; SENSE; Ellipsoidal sampling; Brain

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA059880-08S1, R01 CA059880, R01 CA59880, P50 CA97257, P50 CA097257, R01 CA059880-06, P50 CA097257-010002] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The goal of this Study was to implement time efficient data acquisition and reconstruction methods for 3D magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) of gliomas at a field strength of 3T using parallel imaging techniques. Methods: The point spread functions, signal to noise ratio (SNR), spatial resolution, metabolite intensity distributions and Cho:NAA ratio of 3D ellipsoidal, 3D sensitivity encoding (SENSE) and 3D combined ellipsoidal and SENSE (c-SENSE) k-space sampling schemes were compared with conventional k-space data acquisition methods. Results: The 3D SENSE and e-SENSE methods resulted in similar spectral patterns as the conventional MRSI methods. The Cho:NAA ratios were highly correlated (P <.05 for SENSE and P<.001 for c-SENSE) with the ellipsoidal method and all methods exhibited significantly different spectral patterns in tumor regions compared to normal appearing white matter. The geometry factors ranged between 1.2 and 1.3 for both the SENSE and c-SENSE spectra. When corrected for these factors and for differences in data acquisition times, the empirical SNRs were similar to values expected based upon theoretical grounds. The effective spatial resolution of the SENSE spectra was estimated to be same as the corresponding fully sampled k-space data, while the spectra acquired with ellipsoidal and e-SENSE 4 space samplings were estimated to have a 2.36-2.47-fold loss in spatial resolution due to the differences in their point spread functions. Conclusion: The 3D SENSE method retained the same spatial resolution as full k-space sampling but with a 4-fold reduction in scan time and an acquisition time of 9.28 min. The 3D e-SENSE method had a similar spatial resolution as the corresponding ellipsoidal sampling with a scan time of 4:36 min. Both parallel imaging methods provided clinically interpretable spectra with volumetric coverage and adequate SNR for evaluating Cho, Cr and NAA. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据