4.7 Article

Oxidation-Responsive Poly(amino ester)s Containing Arylboronic Ester and Self-Immolative Motif: Synthesis and Degradation Study

期刊

MACROMOLECULES
卷 46, 期 21, 页码 8416-8425

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ma401656t

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21174002, 21090351]
  2. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of China [21225416]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the synthesis of a new type of amphiphilic poly(amino ester)s which can be completely degraded in aqueous media via H2O2 oxidation. The polymers were prepared by the controlled Michael-type addition polymerization of a phenylboronic pinacol ester-containing diacrylate and N-aminoethylpiperazine, followed by post-modification with mPEGSK-succinimide ester. Upon oxidation, the side chain phenylboronic esters will be transformed into phenol groups which can trigger the sequential self-immolative process to degrade the polymer main chain. Meanwhile, the amino groups on the polymer main chain are capable of trapping the highly active quinone methides generated in situ during the oxidative degradation of the polymers. Based on the detailed oxidation kinetics and products of several model compounds, the H2O2-triggered degradation of nanoparticles of these copolymers was investigated by NMR spectroscopy, GPC, and Nile red fluorescence probe. The results demonstrate that the poly(amino ester) backbones were completely degraded by H2O2, resulting in the dissociation of nanoparticles. Oxidative degradation rates of the nanoparticles could be accelerated by increasing the concentration of H2O2, the PEGylation degree, or the pH of the buffer. Interestingly, the in situ formed quinone methides could be captured by secondary amines due to their higher nucleophilicity than H2O. Of potential importance, these amphiphilic oxidation-responsive copolymers are sensitive to stimulation of 200 mu M H2O2; therefore, they may find application in the field of intelligent drug/gene delivery systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据