4.7 Article

Salient Features in Uniaxial Extension of Polymer Melts and Solutions: Progressive Loss of Entanglements, Yielding, Non-Gaussian Stretching, and Rupture

期刊

MACROMOLECULES
卷 44, 期 13, 页码 5427-5435

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ma200432q

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR-0821697, CMMI-0926522]
  2. Directorate For Engineering
  3. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [0926522] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Division Of Materials Research
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [804726] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The nonlinear responses of an entangled SBR melt and its solutions in rapid uniaxial extension have been studied by rheometric and rheo-optical measurements. During (startup) extension, the samples progressively lose entanglements. At relatively low rates, all entanglements are eventually lost, leading to yielding, nonuniform extension, and ductile specimen failure. At sufficiently high rates, some entanglements survive to allow non-Gaussian stretching and full chain extension leading to rupture-type sample breakdown when the failure mechanism switches from disentanglement, i.e., mutual chain sliding, to chain scission. The precursor to rupture, i.e., non-Gaussian stretching, is evidenced by the birefringence measurements that show the breakdown of the linear stress optical relation. The corresponding critical stress is found to be proportional to the polymer concentration, in agreement with a scaling analysis based on an entanglement network picture. The onset of non-Gaussian stretching and rupture occurs at higher stretching ratios when the entanglement strands are made longer by dilution as achieved in the three solutions. In other words, both yielding and rupture occur at higher strains with increasing entanglement spacing, underscoring the legitimacy to represent entangled polymers in terms of an elastic network when depicting their predominant nonlinear responses to rapid uniaxial extension.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据