4.7 Article

Surface and Bulk Structural Characterization of a High-Mobility Electron-Transporting Polymer

期刊

MACROMOLECULES
卷 44, 期 6, 页码 1530-1539

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ma102451b

关键词

-

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council UK [EP/E051804/1]
  2. BMBF [05KS7WE1]
  3. EPSRC [EP/E051804/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/E051804/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This publication investigates the microstructure of the high electron mobility polymer poly([N,N'-bis(2-octyldodecyl)-11 naphthalene-1,4,5,8-bis(dicarboximide)-2,6-diyl]-alt-5,5'-(2,2'-12 biothiopene)) (P(NDI2OD-T2)) using a combination of grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (GIXD), near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS), and optical spectroscopies. GIXD measurements confirm extended in-plane lamellae ordering and out-of-plane pi-pi stacking. Angle-resolved surface-sensitive NEXAFS measurements, however, indicate a lack of preferred in-plane or out-of-plane orientation of either the conjugated backbone or side chains at the P(NDI2OD-T2) film surface. This lack of pronounced orientation effects is attributed to a significant proportion of amorphous content in the film, with NEXAFS measurements sensitive to both amorphous and crystalline content while GIXD is sensitive only to coherent ordering. Furthermore, it is found that increased crystallinity in annealed thin films is not beneficial to the performance of top-gate bottom-contact field-effect transistors. In fact, both highly crystalline and amorphous P(NDI2OD-T2) devices exhibit similar device performance with saturation mobilities around 0.04 and 0.02 cm(2)/(V s), respectively, almost I order of magnitude lower than the high-performance devices where the pristine morphology has not been subjected to significant heat treatment. Changes in the optical absorption and Raman spectra of P(NDI2OD-T2) thin films with annealing are also presented and discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据