4.7 Article

Termination and Transfer Kinetics of Butyl Acrylate Radical Polymerization Studied via SP-PLP-EPR

期刊

MACROMOLECULES
卷 43, 期 9, 页码 4023-4031

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ma1006039

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [GRK 585]
  2. Fonds der Chemischen Industrie

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Butyl acrylate (BA) solution polymerization (1.5 M in toluene) was investigated via single-pulse pulsed laser polymerization in conjunction with electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy (SP-PLP-EPR) with emphasis on the termination and transfer kinetics of the system in which two distinctly different types of radicals, secondary chain-end radicals (SPRs) and midchain radicals (MCRs), are present. MCRs are produced by intramolecular hydrogen transfer (backbiting). They may react back to SPRs by monomer addition. The evolution of SPR and MCR concentrations after photoinitiation with an intense laser pulse was measured via highly time-resolved EPR at temperatures between 40 and +60 degrees C. At very low temperatures the MCR concentration is negligible, enabling the chain-length-dependent rate coefficient of SPR termination, k(t)(ss)(i,i), to be directly determined. At higher temperatures it was necessary to use PREDICI simulation of the radical concentration vs time traces, a process which yields the chain-length-dependent rate coefficient of SPR termination for monomeric radicals, k(t)(ss)(1,1), as well as the rate coefficients for backbiting, k(bb), for monomer addition to an MCR, k(p)(t), and for SPR-MCR cross-termination, k(t)(st). The composite model adequately represents k(t)(ss)(i,i), with the power-law exponents alpha(s) = 0.85 +/- 0.09 and alpha(1) = 0.16 +/- 0.07 for short-chain and long-chain radicals, respectively, and a crossover chain length between short-chain and long-chain behavior at around i(c) = 30. The activation energy for both k(t)(ss)(1,1) and k(t)(st)(1,1) is found to be as one would expect for translational diffusion of small molecules.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据