4.7 Article

Synthesis and Lectin Recognition of Glyco Star Polymers Prepared by Clicking Thiocarbohydrates onto a Reactive Scaffold

期刊

MACROMOLECULES
卷 43, 期 19, 页码 8109-8114

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ma100919x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) [DP0771155]
  2. UNSW
  3. Australian Research Council [DP0771155] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glycopolymers with a four-arm star architecture were prepared from poly(vinyl benzyl chloride) (PVBC) star polymers as reactive scaffold and 1-thio-beta-D-glucose sodium salt. The star polymer was prepared via RAFT polymerization using 1,2,4,5-tetrakis(thiobenzoylthiomethyl)benzene as a rate-retarding RAFT Latent at a polymerization temperature of 120 degrees C. The occurrence of known side reactions such as star-star coupling Was partly suppressed by optimizing the reaction conditions. The molecular weight distribution in the early stages of the polymerization (< 50% monomer conversion) remained narrow (PDI < 1.3), but side reaction became more pronounced at higher conversions. The polymers were reacted with equimolar amounts of 1-thio-beta-D-glucose sodium salt in DMSO in the absence of any catalyst. The rate of reaction was monitored using H-1 NMR, confirming full conversion alter a reaction time of 110 h. Six different glyco star polymers with number of repeating units N ranging from 40 to 680 were tested regarding their ability to bind to Concanavalin A (ConA) using turbidity assay. The rate of reaction and t(1/2), the time to reach half of the maximum absorption, was found to reach it maximum and minimum, respectively, at a medium molecular weight. The same molecular weight dependency was obtained using precipitation assay, which determines the amount of ConA conjugated to the glycopolymer. Comparison with linear glycopolymers reveals however that the amount of bound ConA and the rate of clustering are not superior in the star architecture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据