4.7 Article

Peptide-Polymer Bioconjugates via Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization and Their Solution Aggregation into Hybrid Micro/Nanospheres for Dye Uptake

期刊

MACROMOLECULES
卷 43, 期 9, 页码 4050-4061

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ma1001904

关键词

-

资金

  1. CSIR, India
  2. Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Initiatives, DST, India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peptide polymer hybrid bioconjugates containing poly(methyl methacrylate) chains attached with oligopeptide molecules were prepared by atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) using designed peptide-initiators. These initiators were synthesized from newly designed peptides with 2-bromoisobutyric acid via a standard coupling reaction. ATRP of methyl methacrylate was conducted using Br-terminated peptide as macroinitiator and copper(I) chloride/N,N,N',N '',N ''-pentamethyldiethylenetriamine as the catalyst system in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) at an elevated temperature (90 degrees C). The peptide polymer bioconjugates with controllable molecular weights and low polydispersities (PDI < 1.35) were obtained. We devised a simple solution approach in assembling the peptide polymer bioconjugate molecules into hybrid micro/nanospheres in different organic solvents as confirmed from transmission electron microscopy (TEM), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), and dynamic light scattering (DES) results. The average size of the formed hybrid micro/nanospheres decreases with the increase of the polarity of the solvent used in aggregation process. A mechanistic model was suggested for the aggregation of peptide polymer conjugates into hybrid micro/nanospheres that correlates well with the experimental observation. The dye-loaded hybrid micro/nanospheres were simply prepared by mixing an organic dye (Rhodamine 6G) into the aggregated solution of peptide-polymer bioconjugates. The uptake of dye into the micro/nanospheres was studied by fluorescence microscopy and time-correlated single photon counting (TCSPC) techniques.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据