4.7 Article

Cylindrically Confined Diblock Copolymers

期刊

MACROMOLECULES
卷 42, 期 22, 页码 9082-9088

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ma901730a

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
  2. NSF
  3. Division Of Materials Research
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [820506] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lamella-, cylinder-, and sphere-forming block copolymers (BCPs) of polystyrene-b-polybutadiene (PS-b-PBD) were drawn into the pores of anodized aluminum oxide (AAO) membranes ill the melt by capillary forces. After thermal annealing, the nanorods of the BCP were removed by dissolution of the AAO with a weak acid, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used to investigate the resultant morphologies of the confined BCPs. The diameters of the pores in the AAO and the molecular weight of the block copolymers were varied to investigate the effect of confinement on the microphase separation of the BCP. Concentric cylinders were observed for the lamella-forming BCPs under 2D confinement, and deviations of the lamella repeat period were measured as a function of AAO pore diameter. In addition, torus-like morphologies were observed as the degree of confinement increased. For the bulk cylinder-forming BCPs, a rich variety of morphologies, not seen in the bulk, were observed that included stacked torus-like morphologies and single-, double-, and triple-helical morphologies The specific morphology depended on D/L-0, where D is the AAO pore diameter and L-0 is the period of the BCP in the bulk. D/L-0 was varied from 0.92 to 2.22. For bulk sphere-forming BCPs, core-shell cylindrical morphologies, single columns of spherical microdomains, and spirals of doubly and triply paired spherical microdomains were observed. Transmission electron microscopy was also performed in tomography mode (TEMT) to quantitatively determine a 3-D description of the morphologies. The morphologies found were consistent with recent simulations of confined BCPs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据