4.3 Article

N-acetylcysteine for therapy-resistant tobacco use disorder: a pilot study

期刊

REDOX REPORT
卷 20, 期 5, 页码 215-222

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1179/1351000215Y.0000000004

关键词

N-Acetylcysteine; Smoking cessation; Depression; Oxidative stress; Inflammation; Glutathione

资金

  1. Health Sciences Postgraduate Program at Londrina State University, Parana, Brazil (UEL)
  2. Phloracea Pharmaceutics, Londrina, Parana, Brazil

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) may have efficacy in treating tobacco use disorder (TUD) by reducing craving and smoking reward. This study examines whether treatment with NAC may have a clinical efficacy in the treatment of TUD. Methods: A 12-week double blind randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the clinical efficacy of NAC 3 g/day versus placebo. We recruited 34 outpatients with therapy resistant TUD concurrently treated with smoking-focused group behavioral therapy. Participants had assessments of daily cigarette use (primary outcome), exhaled carbon monoxide (COEXH) (secondary outcome), and quit rates as defined by COEXH<6 ppm. Depression was measured with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). Data were analyzed using conventional and modified intention-to-treat endpoint analyses. Results: NAC treatment significantly reduced the daily number of cigarettes used (Delta mean +/- SD = -10.9 +/- 7.9 in the NAC-treated versus -3.2 +/- 6.1 in the placebo group) and COEXH (Delta mean +/- SD = -10.4 +/- 8.6 ppm in the NAC-treated versus -1.5 +/- 4.5 ppm in the placebo group); 47.1% of those treated with NAC versus 21.4% of placebo-treated patients were able to quit smoking as defined by COEXH<6 ppm. NAC treatment significantly reduced the HDRS score in patients with tobacco use disorder. Conclusions: These data show that treatment with NAC may have a clinical efficacy in TUD. NAC combined with appropriate psychotherapy appears to be an efficient treatment option for TUD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据