4.3 Article

Enhanced therapeutic efficacy of lipophilic amphotericin B against Candida albicans with amphiphilic poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) nanogels

期刊

MACROMOLECULAR RESEARCH
卷 22, 期 10, 页码 1125-1131

出版社

POLYMER SOC KOREA
DOI: 10.1007/s13233-014-2162-2

关键词

amphotericin B; solubility; nanogels; poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (pNIPAM); Candida albicans; Candidiasis

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program [2011-0013819, NRF-2013R1A1A1076136]
  2. Mid-career Researcher Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2011-0028796]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2011-0028796] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Candidiasis is a disease with skin rashes caused by the infectious fungus, Candida albicans, and can be potentially life-threatening, especially in immunodeficient patients. Amphotericin B (AmB) is a potent antifungal agent with a broad spectrum to treat Candidiasis, but its inherent low solubility and limited skin bioavailability have prevented its wider clinical use. In this study, we developed poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (pNIPAM)-based nanogels as a versatile carrier to enhance AmB solubility and its efficacy. pNIPAM nanogels enhanced the solubility of AmB by 1.6-fold versus AmB alone. Accordingly, pNIPAM markedly improved the minimal fungicidal concentration (MFC) of AmB by 8 folds from 3.91 to 0.49 mu g/mL. We also attached NH2 group to the pNIPAM nanogel to increase surface charges and investigated its effect on AmB antifungal activity. pNIPAM-NH2 has comparable activity in solid culture to pNIPAM, but 2-fold higher antifungal activity in liquid culture. Our pNIPAM and pNIPAM-NH2 nanogels may be useful as drug delivery agents for the treatment of local antifungal infections by AmB in solid and liquid environments, such as on skin and in blood, with high efficacy and sustainability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据