4.3 Article

Effect of total acrylic/fluorinated acrylic monomer contents on the properties of waterborne polyurethane/acrylic hybrid emulsions

期刊

MACROMOLECULAR RESEARCH
卷 21, 期 6, 页码 709-718

出版社

POLYMER SOC KOREA
DOI: 10.1007/s13233-013-1122-6

关键词

fluorinated acrylic monomer; waterborne polyurethane; acrylate copolymer; hybrid; emulsion

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Korea government (MEST) through GCRC-SOP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stable emulsions of waterborne poly(urethane-urea) (WBPU, soft segment content: 57 wt%, dimethylol propionic acid: 19 mol%/5.8 wt%)/n-butyl acrylate (BA)/glycidyl methacrylate (GMA)/perfluorodecyl acrylate (PFA) (weight ratio of BA/GMA/PFA: 5/3/2) hybrid materials containing 0-30 wt% of acrylate content (fluorinated acrylate content: 0-6 wt%) were successfully prepared by an emulsifier-free/solvent-free prepolymer mixing process. However, the as-polymerized hybrid emulsion containing 40 wt% of acrylic monomer content was found to be unstable, indicating that near 40 wt% in acrylic monomer content was beyond the limit of the self-emulsifying ability. By the curve fitting analysis of IR-peaks and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis, the C-F content was found to increase with the increase in acrylate content. The average particle size of emulsion, young modulus/ yield point in stress-strain curve, hardness, thermostability, and water/methylene iodide-contact angles of the film sample increased with increasing acrylate content. However, the viscosity of emulsion, the elongation at break, water swelling and surface energy of film samples were significantly decreased with increasing acrylate content. The tensile strength of film sample decreased a little with increasing acrylate content. These results point to the strong potential of WBPU (70 wt%)/acrylate copolymer (30 wt%) hybrid as a coating material with the lowest surface energy (18.18 mN/m) and the highest contact angles (water: 111.76o, and methylene iodide: 79.95A degrees).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据