4.3 Article

Effect of Hot Pressing/Melt Mixing on the Properties of Thermoplastic Polyurethane

期刊

MACROMOLECULAR RESEARCH
卷 17, 期 8, 页码 616-622

出版社

POLYMER SOC KOREA
DOI: 10.1007/BF03218918

关键词

thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU); TPU scrap; melt mixing; recycle; thermal degradation

资金

  1. Korea Research Foundation
  2. Korea Government [KRF-2005-217-D00002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In-depth understanding of the influence of hot pressing and melt processing on the properties of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) is critical for effective mechanical recycling of TPU scraps. Therefore, this study focused on the effects of hot pressing and melt mixing on molecular weight (MW), polydispersity index (PDI), melt index (MI), characteristic IR peaks, hardness, thermal degradation and mechanical properties of TPU. The original TPU pellet (o-TPU) showed two broad peaks at lower and higher MW regions. However, four TPU film samples, TPU-0 prepared only by hot pressing of o-TPU pellet and TPU-1, TPU-2 and TPU-3 obtained by hot pressing of melt mixed TPUs (where the numbers indicate the run number of melt mixing), exhibited only a single peak at higher MW region. The TPU-0 film sample had the highest M-n and the lowest PDI and hardness. The TPU-1 film sample had the highest M-w and tensile modulus. As the run number of melt mixing increased, the peak-intensity of hydrogen bonded C=O stretching increased, however, the free C=O peak intensity, tensile strength/elongation at break and average MW decreased. All the samples showed two stage degradations. The degradation temperatures of TPU-0 sample (359 degrees C and 394 degrees C were higher than those of o-TPU (342 degrees C and 391 degrees C). While all the melt mixed samples degraded at almost the same temperature (365 degrees C and 381 degrees C). The first round of hot pressing and melt mixing was found to be the critical condition which led to the significant changes of M-n/M-n/PDI, MI, mechanical property and thermal degradation of TPU.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据