4.7 Article

Probing intermolecular interactions of ZnO-nanoparticle-reinforced molten energetic material

期刊

RARE METALS
卷 41, 期 9, 页码 3180-3185

出版社

NONFERROUS METALS SOC CHINA
DOI: 10.1007/s12598-015-0651-x

关键词

2; 4; 6-Trinitrotoluene; Zinc oxide; Intermolecular interaction; Molecular dynamics simulation

资金

  1. China Academy of Engineering Physics [11076002]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11076002, 51373159, 11402237]
  3. Science and Technology Fund of China Academy of Engineering Physics [2015B0302055]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, ZnO nanoparticles were used to enhance TNT and the microstructure and structure characteristics of TNT/nano-ZnO were investigated through SEM and UV-Vis spectroscopy. Quantum chemistry and molecular dynamics simulation were also conducted to understand the interaction and mechanical properties between ZnO and TNT. The results showed that the addition of 2.85 wt% ZnO nanoparticles reduced the number of voids and defects while increasing the bulk and shear modulus. The modified TNT/ZnO composite exhibited excellent detonation properties and is a potential candidate for high-energy blended explosives.
In this work, metal oxide nanoparticle ZnO was employed for the reinforcement of TNT. Scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) was used to study the microstructure on the fractured surface of TNT/nano-ZnO, and ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectroscopy was utilized for structure characterization. Moreover, to understand the reinforcing mechanism between ZnO and TNT, quantum chemistry and molecular dynamics simulation were undertaken to investigate the intermolecular interaction and mechanical properties. It is concluded that with 2.85 wt% ZnO nanoparticle addition, the amount of voids and defects decreases with the increase in bulk and shear modulus. The modified TNT/ZnO composite has high heat of formation, negative oxygen balance, and good detonation properties, which is expected to be a candidate for high-energy blended explosives.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据