4.7 Article

Reactive Ion Plasma Modification of Poly(Vinyl-Alcohol) Increases Primary Endothelial Cell Affinity and Reduces Thrombogenicity

期刊

MACROMOLECULAR BIOSCIENCE
卷 18, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/mabi.201800132

关键词

endothelial colony forming cells; reactive ion plasma; synthetic biomaterials; thrombogenicity; vascular grafts

资金

  1. Nation Institutes of Health [R01HL130274, R01DE026170, R01HL144113]
  2. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL130274, R01HL144113] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH [R01DE026170] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bulk material properties and luminal surface interaction with blood determine the clinical viability of vascular grafts, and reducing intimal hyperplasia is necessary to improve their long-term patency. Here, the authors report that the surface of a biocompatible hydrogel material, poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) can be altered by exposing it to reactive ion plasma (RIP) in order to increase primary endothelial cell attachment. The power and the carrier gas of the RIP treatment are varied and the resultant surface nitrogen, water contact angle, as well as the ability of the RIP-treated surfaces to support primary endothelial colony forming cells is characterized. Additionally, in a clinically relevant shunt model, the amounts of platelet and fibrin attachment to the surface were quantified during exposure to non-anticoagulated blood. Treatments with all carrier gases resulted in an increase in the surface nitrogen. Treating PVA with O-2, N-2, and Ar RIP increased affinity to primary endothelial colony forming cells. The RIP treatments did not increase the thrombogenicity compared to untreated PVA and had significantly less platelet and fibrin attachment compared to the current clinical standard of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE). These findings indicate that RIP-treatment of PVA could lead to increased patency in synthetic vascular grafts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据