4.7 Article

Design of AlCrSiN multilayers and nanocomposite coating for HSS cutting tools

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 351, 期 -, 页码 803-810

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.05.191

关键词

Nanocomposite coatings; Microstructures; Mechanical performance; Wear mechanisms; Cutting tools

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [51305002]
  2. International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China [2014DFG72720]
  3. Science Foundation of Anhui Province [1408085QE92]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present work, AlCrN coating and AlCrSiN multilayer and nanocomposite coating were designed and deposited on the surface of high speed steel (HSS) cutters. The microstructures of these coatings were investigated systematically by means of grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (GIXRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscope (XPS), electron probe X-ray microanalysis (EPMA), scanning electron microscope (SEM) and high-resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM), in association with mechanical property measurement and corresponding cutting test. The results showed that the AlCrN coating mainly composed of nanocrystalline fcc-CrN, hcp-AlN and fcc-(Cr,Al)N solid-solution. In addition to these nanocrystalline phases, a few amorphous Si3N4 phases were observed for the AlCrSiN multilayers and nanocomposite coating with a stronger {200} preferred orientation. The modulation period (6 nm) of the AlCrSiN coating was much smaller than that of the AlCrN coating (18 nm). The service life of the AlCrSiN coated tool increased approximately 40% longer in comparison with the AlCrN coated tool because of its more excellent mechanical properties (48 GPa hardness, 1123 MPa toughness, 52 N LC2 adhesion strength and 0.25 average friction coefficient). During the cutting process, the wear mechanisms of coated tools at the early stage and mid-stage were abrasion wear and adhesion wear, respectively. And the worn loss of AlCrSiN coated tool was less than that of AlCrN coated tool. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据