4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

The radiosensitizing activity of the SMAC-mimetic, Debio 1143, is TNFα-mediated in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

期刊

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
卷 116, 期 3, 页码 495-503

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.05.017

关键词

Radiosensitizer; SMAC-mimetic; IAP inhibitor; HNSCC

资金

  1. Debiopharm International SA, Switzerland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and purpose: Second mitochondria-derived activator of caspase (SMAC)-mimetics are a new class of targeted drugs that specifically induce apoptotic cancer cell death and block pro-survival signaling by antagonizing selected members of the inhibitor of apoptosis protein (IAP) family. Material and methods: The present study was designed to investigate the radiosensitizing effect and optimal sequence of administration of the novel SMAC-mimetic Debio 1143 in vitro and in vivo. Apoptosis, alteration of DNA damage repair (DDR), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) signaling were examined. Results: In vitro, Debio 1143 displayed anti-proliferative activity and enhanced intrinsic radiation sensitivity in 5/6 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cell lines in a synergistic manner. In vivo, Debio 1143 dose-dependently radio-sensitized FaDu and SQ20B xenografts, resulting in complete tumor regression in 8/10 FaDu-xenografted mice at the high dose level. At the molecular level, Debi. 1143 combined with radiotherapy (RT) induced enhancement of caspase-3 activity, increase in Annexin V-positive cells and karyopyknosis, and increase in TNF-alpha mRNA levels. Finally, in a neutralization experiment using a TNF-alpha-blocking antibody and a caspase inhibitor, it was shown that the radiosensitizing effect of Debio 1143 is mediated by caspases and TNF-alpha. Conclusions: These results demonstrate that the novel SMAC-mimetic Debio 1143 is a radiosensitizing agent that is worthy of further investigation in clinical trials in combination with radiotherapy. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据