4.5 Article

Cation-exchange chromatography of monoclonal antibodies Characterization of a novel stationary phase designed for production-scale purification

期刊

MABS
卷 2, 期 4, 页码 395-404

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.4161/mabs.12303

关键词

ion-exchange chromatography; dynamic binding capacity; tentacle surface modification; linear gradient elution; hcp removal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel cation-exchange resin, Eshmuno (TM), was compared to Fractogel (R) SO3- (M) and Toyopearl GigaCap S-650M. The stationary phases have different base matrices and carry specific types of polymeric surface modifications. Three monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) were used as model proteins to characterize these chromatographic resins. Results from gradient elutions, stirred batch adsorptions and confocal laser scanning microscopic investigations were used to elucidate binding behavior of mAbs onto Eshmuno (TM) S and Fractogel (R) SO3- and the corresponding transport mechanisms on these two resins. The number of charges involved in mAb binding for Eshmuno (TM) S is lower than for Fractogel (R) SO3-, indicating a slightly weaker electrostatic interaction. Kinetics from batch uptake experiments are compared to kinetic data obtained from confocal laser scanning microscopy images. Both experimental approaches show an accelerated protein adsorption for the novel stationary phase. The influence of pH, salt concentrations and residence times on dynamic binding capacities was determined. A higher dynamic binding capacity for Eshnnuno (TM) S over a wider range of pH values and residence times was found compared to Fractogel (R) SO3- and Toyopearl GigaCap S-650M. The capture of antibodies from cell culture supernatant, as well as post-protein A eluates, were analyzed with respect to their host cell protein (hcp) removal capabilities. Comparable or even better hcp clearance was observed at much higher protein loading for Eshnnuno (TM) S than Fractogel (R) SO3- or Toyopearl GigaCap S-650M.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据