4.7 Article

Guava, orange and passion fruit by-products: Characterization and its impacts on kinetics of acidification and properties of probiotic fermented products

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 98, 期 -, 页码 69-76

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.08.010

关键词

Functional food; Bioactive compounds; Fermented cereal-based beverage; Fermented goat milk

资金

  1. Sao Paulo State Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2014/02131-8, 2014/02132-4]
  2. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [307155/2015-3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed at characterizing guava, orange and passion fruit by-products and investigating the effect of adding these fruit by-products to probiotic fermented goat milk and cereal-based fermented products. Fruit by-products showed total fiber content, phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity varying from, respectively, 58.20-89.80%, 253.14-420.89 mg GAE/100 g, and 11.38-17.37 mu mol TE/g. Most carotenoids were represented by beta-carotene, which ranged from 7.91 to 56.07 mu g/g. The presence of fruit by-products did not affect the fermentation time of fermented oat beverage and fermented goat milk; however, a significant increase (ranging from 0.28 to 0.91 h) in fermentation time of fermented rice beverages was observed after the addition of by-products. Fruit by-products also resulted in an increase in acidification throughout storage; however, they did not affect the counts of probiotic bacteria. A decrease in probiotic survival during in vitro gastrointestinal simulation was observed in all treatments. Nonetheless, the presence of orange and passion fruit by-products enhanced the resistance of the probiotics to simulated gastrointestinal conditions and resulted in population 2 log CFU/mL higher than the control treatment. Fruit by-products can be considered relevant sources of bioactive compounds useful in raising the functional attributes of probiotic fermented products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据