4.7 Article

Qualitative and quantitative analysis of chlorpyrifos residues in tea by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) combined with chemometric models

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 97, 期 -, 页码 760-769

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.07.055

关键词

Chlorpyrifos; Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS); Chemometrics; Nanoparticle; Tea samples

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFD0400800]
  2. Key RAMP
  3. D Program of Jiangsu Province [BE2017357]
  4. National Key RAMP
  5. D Program of China [2017YFC1600801]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) combined with chemometric models were employed to develop a rapid, low-cost, and sensitive method for qualitative and quantitative analysis of chlorpyrifos residues in tea. Au@Ag nanoparticles (NPs) with high enhancement factor were synthesized and coupled with chemometric algorithms for SERS measurements. K-nearest neighbors (KNN) classification models gave the best performance model with high classification rates (90.84-100.00%) achieved. For the quantification models for predicting chlorpyrifos contents, the genetic algorithm-partial least squares (GA-PLS) models and synergy interval partial least squares-genetic algorithm (siPLS-GA) models applied to standard normal variate transformation (SNV) preprocessed training and validation data set showed better prediction performances with excellent regression quality (slope = 0.98-1.00), higher correlation coefficient of determination (r(2) = 0.96-0.98), and lower root mean -square error of prediction (RMSEP = 0.29, 0.31) than other quantification models. Paired sample t-test exhibited no statistically significant difference between the reference values determined by GC-MS and the predicted values in most quantification models. The proposed method would be a more effective and powerful tool for classification and determination of chlorpyrifos (CPS) residues in tea samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据