4.7 Article

Textural and thermal properties of low-lipid meat emulsions formulated with fish oil and different binders

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 51, 期 2, 页码 514-523

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2012.12.006

关键词

Low-lipid meat sausages; Fish oil; Oscillatory rheometry; Modulated differential scanning calorimetry; Texture

资金

  1. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnologicas (CONICET, Argentina)
  2. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica (Argentina)
  3. Universidad Nacional de La Plata

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of the addition of several binders (milk proteins concentrate, whey protein concentrate, thermally treated whey protein concentrate, ovalbumin, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose, methylcellulose, mixtures of kappa:iota carrageenans or xanthan-locust bean gums) to low-lipid meat emulsions formulated with fish oil were compared to control formulations with fat or fish oil without any binder added. Process yields were higher than 96 g/100 g, except for formulation with hydroxypropylmethylcellulose. Formulations with hydrocolloids presented less weight lost by centrifugation than both controls. The differences in the amount of non-frozen water explain the results obtained for process yield and liquid released by centrifugation. Significant differences in hardness were found between formulations. Addition of milk proteins concentrate, xanthan-locust bean gums, and mix of carrageenans gave the highest hardness, similar to control formulation with fat. Hardness presented a good correlation with the plateau modulus obtained from frequency sweep curves. The mechanical spectra of cooked batters showed a gel-like behavior. Viscoelastic behavior of the cooked batters was satisfactory modeled using broadened BSW equation to predict the mechanical relaxation spectrum in the linear viscoelastic range. Thermo-rheological curves were related with modulated differential scanning calorimetry results. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据